so, we decided to change our idea...... I believe that this new idea has the starting basis to be a successful thriller opening and I as a director will feel more comfortable directing our new idea on the basis that it has a more engaging narrative and will allow use to showcase our media talent.
Working Title: Omitted
Film Genre: Crime/Conspiracy Thriller
Film Length: 1hr 25 minutes
Target Audience: 16-50
Tag Line: ‘Are you really safe alone?’ ‘How far can you go?’ ‘Regret?’
Story Synopsis: A homeless brother and sister are forced out of their home and end up living in an abandoned house. The brother goes off to get necessities whilst the sister remains eating porridge trying to get warm. There are parallel edits to show a build of tension in return of the brother to where the sister is taken.
Further inquests post opening would tell the story around how the brother gets his sister back, discussing and plotting this revenge working backwards.
Visual Realisation: Low key lighting, alongside grey skies and bare trees to represent the winter to relate to the hardship that the homeless face. Some scenes will be light with eerie filters to show the unsettled moods. Darker when reflecting in woods for the kidnap scenes. A tinged filter would work especially well here. Varied camera angles will be used to show an unsettled mood in parallel edit, to a light shop where the homeless man is, crossing to the arrival of the car. Sounds – diegetic in homeless scenes to highlight the action and things they do, and discordant whilst at the kidnap scene.
Statement of Intent: A crime crossed conspiracy thriller that involves a kidnap. The brothers search through will tell the story, however will involve red herrings to open the audience to perception and meanings, away from the original story line. The audience will care for the entertainment and the aim is to deceive them into to actually believing it is true, whilst being sympathetic, highlighting social issues, like homelessness in this film. This is a film as instead of waiting weeks to encounter the true story, and it is easily to reflect back to the start, whereas in a television drama this may be hard to do.
What If?’ Premise: What if a brother can trust his own absence for 10 minutes? A young girl, a sister has been omitted for no known reason, or is it? The story may lead to a switch in the last moments, whilst the kidnap leads them with clues to different directions. Could it be for the fun? What if the homeless are more powerful than we think?
Audience Appeal: Initially, the intended audience would have to be of suitable age since as kidnap takes place in it, therefore would be for more mature audiences. However, to be accessed by a larger audience, the film could be accessed by 15’s upwards to give opportunity for wide audience views as there is no explicit language or graphic images used. Large amounts of details and images shows the film isn’t appropriate for anyone who is not mature and capable of dealing with such concepts, such as kidnap, therefore 15 upwards. I have chosen not to rate this 18 upwards as the film does not feature any gore. This would be accessible by anyone no matter their age, gender, or ethnicity, and is purely for entertainment, whilst making the audience think at the same time.